Solving the Million-Step Problem with Microagents
MAKER Comparison Protocol
Monolith vs. Swarm Agent Architecture
Standard Agent
MAKER Swarm
While models like GPT and Claude have achieved breakthroughs in reasoning and tool use, they share a fundamental flaw when tackling real-world processes: they inevitably break down after a few hundred steps due to a persistent, low-level error rate. This "weakest link" problem means a 1% error rate on a traditional benchmark guarantees failure on a million-step task. But what if we could eliminate errors completely? A new paper introduces MAKER, a framework that solves this scalability crisis
So how does MAKER work? minimizing model cost and then implements 3 key features:
Maximal Agentic Decomposition (MAD): Breaking down a task into the smallest possible single-step subtasks, assigning each to a focused microagent. This prevents context overload and keeps the per-step error rate stable as the task length increases.
First-to-ahead-by-k Voting: Exploiting the modularity of MAD, multiple agents independently solve the same subtask, with a "first-to-ahead-by-k" voting scheme determining the correct output. This exponentially reduces the per-step error probability.
Red-Flagging: Discarding LLM responses that show structural or formatting anomalies, as these often correlate with reasoning errors, thereby increasing the effective per-step success rate
MAKER demonstrated how a system can reliably solve a million-step task with zero errors not by using a single, monolithic, super-intelligent LLM, but by coordinating a swarm of smaller, focused microagents.
You can interact with the model below and test different scenario by changing the number of discs and the k-voting variables.